Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Thursday, April 10, 2008

A Fuller Picture of Your Lungs

A cheap MRI machine images lung function more realistically.

By Katherine Bourzac

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Standup MRI: A cheap MRI system for visualizing lung function uses parts available at any hardware store. Subjects sitting up and lying down inside the scanner wear an antenna made from a cardboard tube, coils of wire, and a rubber covering. The fence-like arrangement of metal wires directs a weak magnetic field towards the subject. At bottom is Harvard visiting scientist Matthew Rosen, who built the system.
Credit: Matthew Rosen/Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can create detailed images of almost all the tissues of the body, allowing doctors to monitor blood flow in the brain, map the borders of tumors, and find slipped spinal discs. But conventional MRI, which images water in the body, produces poor pictures of the lungs, which are full of air, and gives an incomplete picture of lung functions. Now researchers at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, MA, have built a cheap MRI machine that uses a weak magnetic field to image critical aspects of lung physiology that are invisible to conventional imaging techniques.

Led by Matthew Rosen, a visiting scientist at the Harvard-Smithsonian center, and Ronald Walsworth, a senior lecturer in physics at Harvard, the researchers built an MRI scanner that images how gas flows through the lungs and how much oxygen is being absorbed throughout lung tissue. They've used the system to study how lung function differs when lying down and sitting or standing up, and are planning a study of asthma in conjunction with the Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging in Boston. The system has not yet been used to compare healthy and diseased patients. If it proves its worth in clinical trials, the Harvard researchers believe it would be inexpensive and simple enough to be used in pulmonologists' offices.

Lung function is dependent on the orientation of the body, but it hasn't been possible to study this before because conventional MRI would require patients to lie on their backs. (PET can be used to look at some aspects of the physiology of the lungs but it gives limited information.) Asthma symptoms can be exacerbated when patients lie down, for example. The Harvard system "allows imaging with the patient in any orientation, something no one has ever been able to do," says Bastiaan Driehuys, an assistant professor at the Center for In Vivo Microscopy at Duke University.

The open MRI system may also make it possible to monitor the lung function of newborns in intensive care without taking them out of their incubators. The researchers have filed a provisional patent for this application.

Unlike conventional MRI, which images the protons in water molecules, the Harvard MRI system monitors magnetically polarized helium gas inhaled by subjects. Conventional MRI requires a magnet about 150 times stronger than that in the Harvard system to magnetically align protons inside the body. But the helium used in the Harvard system is magnetically aligned before the patient inhales it, making it possible to use a very weak magnet inside the scanner.

[1] 2 Next »

Comments

  • A Fuller Picture of Your Lungs
    rdvandell on 04/10/2008 at 3:47 PM
    Posts:
    11
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    Hey, fantastic work!!

    Unfortunately, "Radiologists" continue to state they do not understand MRI well enough to support it in favor of X-Rays.

    I propose having the "Radiologists" stand outside the shield wall during procedures. Do that and you'll see MRI replace X-Rays in a tick.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: A Fuller Picture of Your Lungs
      lmwong on 04/11/2008 at 7:15 PM
      Posts:
      1
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      I'm sorry, but that image looks nothing like the MRIs I interpret as a "radiologist". This group is looking at a functional component of the lungs, rather than an anatomical component, much more like a nuclear medicine VQ scan, which gives you very similar nonspecific images to reveal areas of ventilation vs perfusion. An MRI unit is huge and vastly more expensive than an x-ray unit. An x-ray will take a second to do, while an MRI can take minutes to hours. With the number of x-rays done during a day, there's no way an MRI can ever replace x-rays. For bread and butter medicine, an MRI will not give you more information than a simple x-ray will. Some people with metal in their body cannot have MRIs done. The radiation dose of 1 chest x ray equals 10 days of background radiation you get living at sea level. We "radiologists" and radiology technicians stand behind shielded walls because we take hundreds of these x-rays a day, every day of our lives.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: A Fuller Picture of Your Lungs
        Katherine Bourzac on 04/14/2008 at 12:42 PM
        Technology Review TR Staff
        Associate Editor
        Posts:
        8
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
        lmwong, yes, you're right. They're doing functional, not structural, imaging, so they can't detect, for example, a tumor. Their pictures show not what the lungs look like but how much oxygen they pull in and absorb in different regions. The magnet strength in their machine is only up to about 100 gauss. The idea is not to displace X-rays or conventional MRI, but to build a cheap diagnostic for lung disease that might be simple enough to use in the doctor's office.

        The researchers did compare their work to nuclear medicine scans. They say their technique should give the same kind of information without exposing patients to radiation, and should take less time for imaging. However, as they caution, until they build up data from large clinical studies, this is somewhat speculative.
        Rate this comment: 12345
  • Can I volunteer?
    lilyphoenix on 04/10/2008 at 5:05 PM
    Posts:
    1
    I'd gladly volunteer if it would help figure out why my asthma is worse lying down than anything. Do these people have an email?

    Edit: Even though the equipment is rather freaky looking.
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology