|
Tuesday, May 06, 2008 The Candidates on TechnologyFind out where Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John McCain stand on key technology issues. By Matt Mahoney
Credit: Alastair Halliday There is no question that each of the three candidates left in the 2008 presidential campaign realizes the importance that technology issues will play in the general election to come. Whether paying court at Google headquarters in Mountain View, CA, or answering detailed questionnaires from technology publications, each candidate has felt compelled to lay out a road map of where he or she plans to lead the country on these complex and sometimes controversial issues. Our interactive guide attempts to give readers a sense of where the candidates currently stand, and it points to key legislation that each candidate has introduced or voted on to see where he or she has stood in the past. It is little surprise that the youngest candidate, Barack Obama, has the most detailed technology platform--no other candidate has vowed to crack down on phishing or spyware, for instance. Obama's strong support for net neutrality and his ambitious proposal to increase broadband deployment nationwide have won him the endorsement of such tech luminaries as free-culture proponent Lawrence Lessig and Netscape cofounder Marc Andreessen. But Silicon Valley votes alone will not win the presidency, and Obama's support for corn ethanol and coal-to-liquid fuel subsidies, while popular in the Midwest, has caused some environmentalists to question his green credentials. Obama's opponent in the Democratic primary, Hillary Clinton, has also thrown her support behind corn ethanol as a key piece of her energy plan, despite opposition to federal subsidies earlier in her Senate career. She also joins Obama, as well as John McCain, in proposing a cap-and-trade program for cutting greenhouse-gas emissions to fight global warming, which every candidate agrees is a threat. Clinton supports net neutrality and promises to extend broadband service into underserved areas, while her proposed "Privacy Bill of Rights" seeks to establish a national consensus on privacy issues in the digital age. John McCain, the Republican nominee, can sometimes seem uncomfortable fielding technology questions (when asked, "Mac or PC?", McCain responded, "Illiterate"), but his long tenure on the Senate Commerce Committee has given him valuable knowledge of the industry's inner workings. So it is not unfamiliarity with the issues but, instead, his avowed commitment to free-market principles that has led McCain to oppose net-neutrality legislation and further regulation of the telecommunications industry. Although McCain joins Clinton and Obama in promising to ease the restrictions on embryonic stem-cell research put in place by President Bush, his public statements on the issue have become increasingly cautious as he seeks to establish himself as a pro-life candidate. In recent interviews, he has held out hope that advances in reprogramming skin cells into embryonic stem cells will render the controversy moot. |
Audio »
Share »
Digg this
Add to del.icio.us
Add to Reddit
Add to Facebook
Slashdot It!
Stumble It!
Add to Newsvine
Add to Connotea
Add to CiteUlike
Add to Furl
Googlize this
Add to Rojo
Add to MyWeb
Favorite
Print
E-mail
Is the Net Too Neutral?
03/11/2008
Comments
zig158 on 05/06/2008 at 1:49 AM
37
Just imagine a candidate that cared more about the future of our country than increasing their personal power at any cost.
stradric on 05/06/2008 at 10:44 AM
15
b_calder on 05/06/2008 at 5:50 AM
2
jpontin on 05/06/2008 at 8:36 AM
Editor in Chief and Publisher
11
Gary 7 on 05/06/2008 at 10:38 AM
1
GAry 7
stradric on 05/06/2008 at 10:53 AM
15
I mean, there is still a substantial portion of the population that not only supports George Bush, but also believes Global Warming is a myth. I yearn for the day when the debate is as intellectual as we would like. However, such a conversation now would be over people's heads. Sad but true.
RD on 05/06/2008 at 12:38 PM
47
Scottar on 05/11/2008 at 3:32 PM
6
You are absolutely right. Go to sites like- adognamedkyoto.blogspot.com, and you will see how the science has been hijacked by Envirocrats and scientists on the grant gravy train, they play upon the publics ignorance of long term climate trends vers short climate burps of cooling and warming. Al Gore is a prime example who the socialist MSM fawns over and gives undue credence.
People put to much emphasis on big government to solve problems instead of themselves who can solve their own problems. There's a big grain of truth to what Reagan said that government is the problem. McCain has good ideas mixed in with some very bad ideas like carbon capping/trading. Most every country that has pursued that avenue has ended up with more carbon emissions and a more crippled economy. It's just another failed socialist program.
The other two candidates are mostly the same on their programs, more big government programs that have never really worked in other countries. They just appear to as MSM does not report the drawbacks of socialized programs and their red tape. Social Security and Medicare are two prime examples.
Our capitalist society has flaws but it also has socialist anarchists who exaggerate those shortcomings. The worst shortcoming of America is it's education system that has been hijacked by socialists where emphasis on the three R's and science has waned for feel good, social conscious programs that neuter real progress. The result is that people are intellectually handicapped to make sound choices. Reverend Wright would be a good model for that.
There is no one energy solution that will replace fossil fuels. The world will be dependent on fossil fuels for decades until viable alternatives are discovered and improved. It will endup being a mix of bio, hydrogen, solar, wind and nuclear. For now, more efficient methods can be developed to utilize coal, gas and oil. People can make choices with the assistance of consumer groups. For example, people in Northern climate would opt for nuclear and clean coal with some wind as opposed to solar energy that would predominate in sunny southern locations. City dwellers would opt for an electrical vehicle with urban and rural dwellers would opt for bio and electrical. And those choices could likely change as technology brings forth new alternatives. New advances in battery technology is making the electric vehicle more viable. But the government has chosen to put our money on corn based ethanol due to corn lobbyist pressure groups.
The problem is some people make bad choices due to a lack of science education or are not technically competent to make sound choices in this increasingly technical complex world. They would prefer that someone or something make choices for them. They have not been taught how to think for themselves. I have made bad choices in the past due to lack of education and ignorance. If I had in the past access to the right education resources I could have avoided those bad choices, but I would still rather have a choice as opposed to stupid government mandates that led to the gas crunch of the 70's and has crippled the nuclear program over fear mongering.
stradric on 05/06/2008 at 11:01 AM
15
As much as I am against McCain, I have to give him credit for his vote there -- though I question whether it was inspired by such forethought and not some other private interests.
mkogrady on 05/06/2008 at 1:27 PM
64
www.digitalfuel.org/Presentations/National-Telecommuting-Program.ppt
mkogrady on 05/06/2008 at 1:32 PM
64
Reuters had an artical about Super-Spike today too that indicated we could see crude jump over $200/barrel....
zig158 on 05/09/2008 at 2:26 AM
37
ferrisvalyn on 05/07/2008 at 2:59 AM
1
alioop on 05/13/2008 at 9:28 PM
3
To expect it all just to become A-OK once the government starts paying for things seems counterintuitive to me. However, the social liberal in me wants to say: "Bad McCain! Private enterprise shouldn't be mixed up with medicine!"
I'm still searching them up, but I was able to find two videos comparing Obama and McCain on health care. Even after that, McCain's plan seems just as viable as Obama's, just in a different way. Anybody want to chime in? Perhaps you could sway a confused voter.
And we can all forget about Clinton no. It's not going to happen... thankfully.