Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Friday, March 03, 2006

A Quantum Encryption Breakthrough

This new technique dupes eavesdroppers.

By Kate Greene

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Researchers at the University of Toronto have shown, in a study published in the February 24 issue of Physical Review Letters, that one of the present liabilities of quantum cryptography can be turned into an advantage. Using "quantum decoys," Professor Hoi-Kwong Lo and his team are increasing the distance that quantum-encrypted data can be sent over fiber-optic cable.

Quantum cryptography uses particles of light called photons to create and send keys used for coding and decoding messages. A photon can transmit bits of a key by representing a 1 or 0, depending on a property called polarization. The sender of this key (physicists call her "Alice") transmits a string of randomly polarized single photons to the recipient ("Bob"), who collects each photon, one at a time.

The reason this technique is so secure is that photons possess a safeguard inherent in quantum mechanics. For an eavesdropper to listen in, he or she must tap the fiber-optic line and measure the polarization of the photons with a detector as the photons arrive. But quantum mechanics dictates that any measurement, such as the one taken by the eavesdropper, unavoidably modifies the polarization. This means that Bob would notice if a transmission had been intercepted -- as soon as he and Alice compared notes (over a channel that doesn't need to be secure) about the polarization of photons sent and received. Any inconsistency in the sent and received photons would alert them to the fact that the key had been stolen.

A problem arises, however, when more than a single photon is inadvertently sent at a time -– a common occurrence since no perfect single photon emitter exists. This happens, says Jonathan Habif, quantum information research scientist at BBN Technologies, because scientists send pulses of laser light through a series of filters until only one photon squeezes through; but the filtering process isn't perfect, and sometimes more than one photon per pulse gets through.

When two photons of the same polarization are sent, one of them can be picked off by the eavesdropper, while the other one will go through unchanged, as if nothing is amiss. Additionally, Habif says, in order to send a quantum-encrypted key farther, the initial light from the laser must be more intense, which means there must be more photons to begin with, thus increasing the likelihood that more than one photon will squeak through the filters.

[1] 2 Next »

Comments

  • I don't get it
    Guest (Silicon Valley Sender) on 03/03/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Now let me see.  If I use sets of polarized quantum photons of nearly, if not identical frequency assigned with known sets acting as decoys and if any of  the non-decoy sets (the real McCoy) are not polarizedly correct then I know of foul play.  Now I think I know how it works.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Got it!
      Guest (Silicon Valley receiver) on 03/03/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      It doesn't work.  What I got was gramatically incorrect, so the message doesn't mean diddly?  I mean hey, McCoys, decoys, light strings, quantum light that gets bent out of shape by criminals, no less.  Yep, sounds like the Government.  Not Alice but AliCIA.  BTW, what's a Texa?
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Brew That Is True?
        Guest (Colin) on 03/04/2006 at 12:00 AM
        Posts:
        1
        Reciever: The Chalace from the palace holds the brew that is true?

        Sender: No! They broke the chalace from the palace. The pellet with the poison is in the vesel with the pestle. The flagon with the dragon holds the brew that is true. Get it?

        Reciever: Got it.

        Sender: Good.

        Users: Thank goodness for quantum encription.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        • In the light
          Guest (Giacomo) on 03/15/2006 at 12:00 AM
          Posts:
          1
          If you hold the light juuusst right...

          It looks like a purple pimpernel.
          Rate this comment: 12345
    • Get it?
      Guest (Silicon Valley Interceptor) on 03/03/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Shouldn't it be identically frequent rather than identical frequency?  Am I being coherent? or am I coherent?  Guess it depends if infinitive or here and now.  Is it sometimes right being wrong?  Before enLIGHTenment carrying water and chopping wood.  After enLIGHTenment chopping wood and carrying water (or vice versa?).  Is it contiguity or ambiguity, the real decoy or just a bunch of McCoys. 
      Well, where are you Hatfields?
      Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology