Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
« Back 1 [2]

Friday, March 03, 2006

A Quantum Encryption Breakthrough

Continued from page 1

By Kate Greene

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Professor Lo, lead scientist on the Toronto study, has cleverly used these problematic extra photons to dupe eavesdroppers. The light in his experiment is prepared in such a way that a small percentage of photons are decoys that contain no information at all about the key. "The eavesdropper has no idea which is the signal or which is the decoy," Lo says. "In the end, Alice and Bob can compare, and Alice will announce [in a separate message that doesn't need to be encrypted] which ones are the signals and which are the decoys." The signal photons contain information about the key, but the eavesdropper doesn't know which photons she measured.

The concept of using decoys in quantum cryptography was first proposed in 2003 by Won-Young Hwang, then at Northwestern University in Evanston, IL. In 2005, Lo says, his team mathematically proved that the technique could enhance security. In their most recent announcement, Lo and his team have shown for the first time that the decoy method can actually work in a real-world environment, using a modified off-the-shelf quantum cryptographic system and commercial fiber optics.

The major implication of their findings is that quantum cryptography should now be usable over greater distances. "Prior to decoy states, you couldn't ramp up the signal to increase the distance," says Jim Harrington, a researcher at Los Alamos National Laboratory, "because you would send out more than one photon."

Lo and his team claim that the new technique can guarantee security over 15 kilometers of commercial fiber-optic lines. While this isn't a distance record, Lo says small modifications to the setup could allow extremely secure transactions over 120 kilometers -– roughly the current upper limit claimed for commercial quantum encryption systems, such as those from id Quantique of Geneva, Switzerland, and MagiQ Technologies of New York City.

« Back 1 [2]

Comments

  • I don't get it
    Guest (Silicon Valley Sender) on 03/03/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Now let me see.  If I use sets of polarized quantum photons of nearly, if not identical frequency assigned with known sets acting as decoys and if any of  the non-decoy sets (the real McCoy) are not polarizedly correct then I know of foul play.  Now I think I know how it works.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Got it!
      Guest (Silicon Valley receiver) on 03/03/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      It doesn't work.  What I got was gramatically incorrect, so the message doesn't mean diddly?  I mean hey, McCoys, decoys, light strings, quantum light that gets bent out of shape by criminals, no less.  Yep, sounds like the Government.  Not Alice but AliCIA.  BTW, what's a Texa?
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Brew That Is True?
        Guest (Colin) on 03/04/2006 at 12:00 AM
        Posts:
        1
        Reciever: The Chalace from the palace holds the brew that is true?

        Sender: No! They broke the chalace from the palace. The pellet with the poison is in the vesel with the pestle. The flagon with the dragon holds the brew that is true. Get it?

        Reciever: Got it.

        Sender: Good.

        Users: Thank goodness for quantum encription.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        • In the light
          Guest (Giacomo) on 03/15/2006 at 12:00 AM
          Posts:
          1
          If you hold the light juuusst right...

          It looks like a purple pimpernel.
          Rate this comment: 12345
    • Get it?
      Guest (Silicon Valley Interceptor) on 03/03/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Shouldn't it be identically frequent rather than identical frequency?  Am I being coherent? or am I coherent?  Guess it depends if infinitive or here and now.  Is it sometimes right being wrong?  Before enLIGHTenment carrying water and chopping wood.  After enLIGHTenment chopping wood and carrying water (or vice versa?).  Is it contiguity or ambiguity, the real decoy or just a bunch of McCoys. 
      Well, where are you Hatfields?
      Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology