Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

T-Rays Advance Toward Airport Screening

A new laser design helps create usable terahertz radiation, which penetrates common materials but doesn't harm tissue.

By Neil Savage

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
This tiny gray rectangle, smaller than the "D" in "DIME," is a quantum cascade laser that could be the key to terahertz imaging technologies for future airport screening devices. The laser is affixed to electronics that control it.
Credit: Source: Qing Hu

Researchers around the world are trying to tap a barely used portion of the electromagnetic spectrum--terahertz radiation--to scan airline passengers for explosives and illegal drugs. The rays are particularly attractive: they can see through clothing, paper, leather, plastic, wood, and ceramics. They don't penetrate as well as x-rays, but they also don't damage living tissue. And they can read spectroscopic signatures, detecting the difference between, say, hair gel and an explosive.

While some commercial systems are already available for limited applications--one Japanese device scans mail for contraband drugs--a machine to scan airline passengers has been slow to evolve, mainly due to the difficulty of creating the terahertz radiation. The ideal scanner would send out a beam of t-rays at passing objects or at people a few meters away, then measure the rays reflected off the subjects and check them against a database of spectroscopic signatures. But most existing sources of t-rays only provide weak beams, which make detection slower and harder.

Now one MIT professor may be on the verge of solving this problem with a new type of laser.

A typical method of producing t-rays--which lie between infrared light and microwaves on the electromagnetic spectrum; frequencies between about 0.5 and 4.0 terahertz are of the most interest--is to use a laser that produces infrared light and, through optical manipulation, retune it to terahertz frequencies. The resulting output is measured in millionths, or even trillionths, of watts. For the detector to pick up that kind of very weak signal, the beam would have to be slowly scanned over an object from a close distance, building an image one pixel at a time. The alternative source is a huge gas laser that takes up an entire lab bench top. Neither is practical for quickly processing thousands of air travelers.

But Qing Hu, a professor in MIT's Research Laboratory of Electronics, has designed pinhead-size lasers that can produce 250 milliwatts at 4.3 terahertz, and slightly less than 100 milliwatts at 1.5 terahertz. That's enough power to send a beam over a distance of several meters, bounce it off an object, and use the return signal to create an instantaneous image. Instead of imaging one pixel at a time, the t-rays could be picked up by a focal plane array, like the detector in a video camera. This would allow security personnel to see under coats and into suitcases as people walk by. "We are able to make a movie in t-rays," Hu says, meaning that his technology can provide real-time imaging.

The key to Hu's technology is a quantum cascade laser, tiny semiconductor with nanometer-scale indentations called quantum wells etched into it. In standard lasers, an electron in a high-energy state drops into a low-energy state, releasing the excess energy as a photon of light. In quantum cascade lasers, the electron drops into a quantum well, emits a photon, and then moves through a thin barrier to the next well, where it emits another photon, and so on--"just like a ping-pong ball going downstairs," Hu says. The result is many more photons, and thus more-powerful t-rays.

[1] 2 Next »

Comments

  • How about in prisons, first?
    nekote on 02/20/2007 at 7:38 AM
    Posts:
    114
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    The big issue, as I have perceived it, is seeing the (nude) outline of the human anatomy.

    How about trying these scanners out in (men's) prisons first, where such issues would be a lesser degree of concern, than necessary security?

    Failure to detect "shanks" (home made stabbing / cutting weapons) truly have murderous results.

    Detecting contraband would also be extremely valuable.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: How about in prisons, first?
      mkogrady on 02/20/2007 at 7:02 PM
      Posts:
      86
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      You'll need two -

      One "whole body" scanner - external model

      One "inner body" scanner - with replacement doo-hicky's (emphasis on Doo!)
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Lovely, just lovely...
    blunney on 02/20/2007 at 9:19 AM
    Posts:
    15
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    I wonder if all the airlines female passengers know they may as well fly naked?  That should do wonders for airline balance sheets.

    The TSA is watching you...
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Lovely, just lovely...
      jsessex on 02/20/2007 at 1:18 PM
      Posts:
      12
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      The nudity need not be a big deal if it is handled properly.  First, provide a display showing that the T-video provides low resolution generic pictures  but shows weapons very well.  Since the cameras see through skin and hair and do not show color, they are far from titillating to the average person.  Screeners should be located in a separate location without any visual connection to the test site allowing the person on the screen to maintain anonymity.  No recording of the video feed would be allowed.  The viewers should be older women, a group not very prone to being titillated by what would very quickly become a fairly boring job.  I think this plan addresses the biggest objections to this type of technology’s implementation.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Lovely, just lovely...
      cyberpageman on 02/21/2007 at 12:46 PM
      Posts:
      23
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      There was a big brouhaha a few years back about video cameras being able to see through clothing.  Maybe they could, but only the "barest" outline.

      When x-rays were first discovered, there was worry about them too.  I remember my physics professor quoting:

      The Roentgen Rays, the Roentgen Rays,
      What is this craze?
      The town's ablaze
      With the new phase
      of X-Ray's ways.

      I'm full of daze,
      shock and amaze;
      For nowadays
      I hear they'll gaze
      Thro' cloak and gown--and even stays,
      Those naughty, naughty Roentgen Rays

      No one worries about Superman's x-ray vision, so why worry about terahertz rays, which are a lot less clear?
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Prospecting w/T-Rays
    abcarterjr on 02/21/2007 at 12:30 PM
    Posts:
    45
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    Could the T- Ray detector  help
    classify a mountain stream as a go-nogo carrier
    of micron gold?

    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Why do we line up for shackles
    ggeek99 on 02/24/2007 at 2:01 AM
    Posts:
    2
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    As I read these applications of "new" technologies, I wonder where the social outrage lies? Why do we raise our wrists to be bound with these new shackles without first asking why?

    Why should it be illegal for adults to eat/smoke/drink the compounds of their choosing in a free society? How can society/government maintain a list of approved and nonapproved foods  & drugs for adult members of that society?

    Why can I not carry a weapon for my protection in a society where the police are armed to the gills and trigger happy and the crooks likewise?

    There is no place where people respect each other more than the parking lot of a gunshop. No one cuts each other off, no one takes anothers parking space. Why? Because they know the other maybe packing heat. Perhaps we would all respect each other a little bit more if we knew we could all defend ourselves in the heat of argument, so why argue?

    If army exists to keep the peace, then so must guns. So why the hurry to disarm the civilian populace and arm the police & military?

    If we implement perfect screening technologies without understanding the implications for our political futures then we deserve the future we get, not matter how how fascist or tyrannical.
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review July/August 2008
The Business of Social Networks
The future of the Web is social. But can social-networking sites ever make money?
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology