Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
[1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »

March 2007

A Smarter Web

New technologies will make online search more intelligent--and may even lead to a "Web 3.0."

By John Borland

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Credit: Polly Becker
Multimedia
•  Video: Tim Berners-Lee talks about the Semantic Web.

This article appears in the March/April 2007 issue of Technology Review.

Last year, Eric Miller, an MIT-affiliated computer scientist, stood on a beach in southern France, watching the sun set, studying a document he'd printed earlier that afternoon. A March rain had begun to fall, and the ink was beginning to smear.

Five years before, he'd agreed to lead a diverse group of researchers working on a project called the Semantic Web, which seeks to give computers the ability--the seeming intelligence--to understand content on the World Wide Web. At the time, he'd made a list of goals, a copy of which he now held in his hand. If he'd achieved those goals, his part of the job was done.

Taking stock on the beach, he crossed off items one by one. The Semantic Web initiative's basic standards were in place; big companies were involved; startups were merging or being purchased; analysts and national and international newspapers, not just technical publications, were writing about the project. Only a single item remained: taking the technology mainstream. Maybe it was time to make this happen himself, he thought. Time to move into the business world at last.

"For the Semantic Web, it was no longer a matter of if but of when," Miller says. "I felt I could be more useful by helping people get on with it."

Now, six months after the launch of his own Zepheira, a consulting company that helps businesses link fragmented data sources into easily searched wholes, Miller's beachside decision seems increasingly prescient. The Semantic Web community's grandest visions, of data-surfing computer servants that automatically reason their way through problems, have yet to be fulfilled. But the basic technologies that Miller shepherded through research labs and standards committees are joining the everyday Web. They can be found everywhere--on entertainment and travel sites, in business and scientific databases--and are forming the core of what some promoters call a nascent "Web 3.0."

Already, these techniques are helping developers stitch together complex applications or bring once-­inaccessible data sources online. Semantic Web tools now in use improve and automate database searches, helping people choose vacation destinations or sort through complicated financial data more efficiently. It may be years before the Web is populated by truly intelligent software agents automatically doing our bidding, but their precursors are helping people find better answers to questions today.

The "3.0" claim is ambitious, casting these new tools as successors to several earlier--but still viable--generations of Net technology. Web 1.0 refers to the first generation of the commercial Internet, dominated by content that was only marginally interactive. Web 2.0, characterized by features such as tagging, social networks, and user-­created taxonomies of content called "folksonomies," added a new layer of interactivity, represented by sites such as Flickr, Del.icio.us, and Wikipedia.

Analysts, researchers, and pundits have subsequently argued over what, if anything, would deserve to be called "3.0." Definitions have ranged from widespread mobile broadband access to a Web full of on-demand software services. A much-read article in the New York Times last November clarified the debate, however. In it, John Markoff defined Web 3.0 as a set of technologies that offer efficient new ways to help computers organize and draw conclusions from online data, and that definition has since dominated discussions at conferences, on blogs, and among entrepreneurs.

[1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
March/April 2007

Would you like to read more articles from the March/April 2007 issue?

This article is from the March/April 2007 Issue of Technology Review. To read other articles from this issue simply register for My.TechnologyReview.com. It's free.

Subscribe today and save up to 41% »

Comments

  • Dewey
    james.c.robertson on 04/09/2007 at 2:53 PM
    Posts:
    1
    A gentle suggestion that OCLC (and librarians) aren't "obsessed with organizing and accessing information", but perhaps "dedicated" to it, instead.  The word "obsessed" reinforces a specific stereotype.
    Also, OCLC only took over ownership of the Dewey Decimal System in 1988.  While Dewey is still used widely in public library systems, most larger systems (like research libraries and universities) use the Library of Congress Classification System -- millions of books classified in the LC system are in the OCLC database.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Web Is Not Packaged Software
    jabailo on 06/16/2007 at 9:15 PM
    Posts:
    4
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    The whole term "Web n.0" is based on naming conventions from packaged software in the 1980s (Word 2.0, Windows 3.11 ).    It's completely wrong for web and internet technologies.   There is no "release date" for these things -- they emerge.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • very instresting
    ???? ????? ????? on 02/05/2008 at 12:27 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Very intresting article Thanks
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology