Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Add RSS Feed XML

What Happened at the Large Hadron Collider

A report details why the particle accelerator was temporarily shut down.
Friday, October 17, 2008
By Katherine Bourzac
Credit: CERN

Physicists and science enthusiasts were excited last month when the Large Hadron Collider, the most ambitious particle accelerator ever built, went online. Nine days later, the accelerator was shut down because of a helium leak. (The superconducting magnets that steer particles on their 27-kilometer collision course are cooled with large volumes of liquid helium.)

Yesterday, CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, released a report detailing what went wrong. Steven Nahn, an MIT physics professor currently working from CERN, says that the analysis took some time because the area had to be warmed up from near absolute zero before it could be accessed for investigation. The problem, the report concludes, arose because of a faulty electrical connection between two magnets, which led to mechanical problems.

"The fact that this happened surprised no one in this business," says Nahn. "You're just starting up a machine that's taken you 20 years to build, you're gonna run into some problems--you can't possibly foresee everything." Over the next several years, Nahn and his thousands of collaborators hope to use the accelerator to solve long-standing physics problems, such as why fundamental particles have mass.

The collider is slated to go online again in early 2009.

Comments

  • horton hears a who
    phoenix on 10/20/2008 at 8:11 AM
    Posts:
    142
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    I always thought that particles had mass so that they could provide functional parameters in all three dimensions. If I'm totally off base with this assumption, however, would someone please set me straight.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: horton hears a who
      udit on 10/22/2008 at 2:58 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      its true that a particle must have some mass ,buts lets consider a photon ,rest mass of a photon is 0 but you cannnot have a photon at rest .it is always in motion.a moving photon always has some mass according to which turs out to be relativistic mass.
      Rate this comment: 12345

Videos

Cleaning Up Shaky Home Video
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review January/February 2009
Lifeline for Renewable Power
Without a radically expanded and smarter electrical grid, wind and solar will remain niche power sources.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology