Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
 

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Add RSS Feed XML

Double-Amputee Runner Awaits Verdict

Oscar Pistorius will soon know whether he can compete in able-bodied competitions using prosthetics that some say give him an unfair advantage.
Tuesday, May 13, 2008
By Brittany Sauser


Credit: The Daily Mail, United Kingdom

The future of technology in sports is awaiting a ruling from the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in Lausanne, Switzerland, where Oscar Pistorius, a South African Paralympics runner, appealed a ruling by the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) that banned him from competing against able-bodied athletes.

Pistorius is a double amputee who competes on J-shaped, carbon-fiber Cheetah blades made by the Icelandic company Össur. After competing in an international able-bodied event in 2007, allegations were made that Pistorius's blades give him an unfair advantage over able-bodied athletes because he can cover more ground than they can and uses less energy than they do, and unlike theirs, his legs are not subject to fatigue. The IAAF--the athletic world's governing body--promptly issued a ban on using technical devices, such as wheels and springs, that give one athlete an advantage over another in competition. It also decided to individually review Pistorius's case.

Following German professor Gert-Peter Brüggemann's testing of Pistorius's prostheses and abilities against able-bodied runners, the IAAF ruled that the prostheses give Pistorius an unfair advantage over able-bodied runners because the results concluded he uses 25 percent less energy to compete than they do. Given the ruling, Pistorius was prohibited from competing in any IAAF able-bodied competitions, including the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing.

Infuriated by the results, Pistorius appealed to the CAS. The testing for the appeal was conducted by six universities in the United States and France and lead by MIT professor Hugh Herr. Their job was to look into the scientific claims made by the IAAF that banned Pistorius from competing. The scientific team concluded that the IAAF allegations were not scientifically valid.

The CAS arbitrators--Martin Hunter from England, Switzerland's Jean-Philippe Rochat, and David Rivkin of the United States--are expected to deliver a verdict in the next few days on whether Pistorius can compete in able-bodied competitions. But their decision should not be individually and empathetically focused on Pistorius, as he has tried to make it in his appeal. The real issue is the use of technological devices in athletic competitions. The scientific evidence should be the backbone of the CAS ruling, but making the decision are three nonscientists. The CAS has a tough decision to make for the future of sports and the case will provide a legal precedent for how other similar cases involving technology in sports will be handled.

Beyond the Playing Field

From the owner of the Boston Celtics to the assistant GM of the Red Sox, high-profile executives were at MIT talking about the analytical side of sports.
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
By Brittany Sauser

MIT's second annual Sports Business Conference, held on February 9, was sold out, and not because Benjamin Watson, the New England Patriots' tight end, was an attendee--that fact was actually omitted from the event's press pack. It was sold out because sports analytics is a hot topic in the professional sports industry.

Industry leaders and business students filled the classrooms of the Stata Center last Saturday to hear key figures--including Wyc Grousbeck, owner of the Boston Celtics; Bill Polian, president of the Indianapolis Colts; RC Buford, GM of the San Antonio Spurs; and Bill James, the pioneer of statistical analysis, who's currently the senior baseball operations advisor for the Boston Red Sox--converse on the future of sports.

Topics ranged from ticket sales to managing salary caps and scouting talent. There were talks on the market value of teams, player trades, and how on-field decisions in football are made.

Grousbeck, the keynote speaker, started his address with an intense, 60-second clip of the Celtics in action. He conceded that, while he had bought the team on 80 percent emotion and 20 percent objective data, the key to being successful is to find a balance between the two. "You should let analytics support and drive your decision making, but do not hide behind it; find a blend," said Grousbeck. He added that, while he is not a "data junkie" (he hires number crunchers), objective data is a useful tool in decision making, and that the Celtics use analytics "24-7."

In a panel called "Defending the Title," Polian, Buford, Jed Hoyer (the assistant GM of the Boston Red Sox), and Brian Burke (the executive vice president and GM of the Anaheim Ducks), along with moderator Peter Gammons, an ESPN analyst and writer, discussed the challenges and benefits of being a defending champion, and how it affects business.

"Football is a systems-driven sport, and the decisions you make on topics on and off the field are critical to success," said Polian. "The Sox do everything right, from player-fan relationships to ticket sales and trophy presentations; we copy them."

The Red Sox have been at the forefront of making their organization an innovative business, and not just in their use of statistical analysis to evaluate players that best fit their roster needs: Hoyer said that they take into account such questions as, can a player play in Boston, a big market with a distinct fan culture?

Buford said that it is "eyes, ears, and the numbers" that drive decisions, and if teams don't try to incorporate the numbers, they will be making a big mistake.

Panels on baseball, basketball, and football analytics were filled with interesting conversations on marketing the teams and making player decisions. One overarching theme in player performance was evident in each panel: more analytical models must be created for things like player character, intelligence, and durability--the likelihood of injury. The use of analytics in football and basketball is still in its infancy, so panelists were reluctant to give any details on their methods. (See "Analytics in Football.") On the other hand, the baseball panel was full of quantitative talk, mostly led by James.

The conference ended with a discussion on the future of professional sports, moderated by conference cochair Daryl Morey, also the GM of the Houston Rockets. Panelist Rick Carlisle, an ESPN analyst and former NBA player and coach, suggested widening the NBA rim and using a point system for NBA standings to increase the entertainment value of the game. James, also part of the panel, discussed the issue of late-night baseball games but said that he did not have a clear solution to the problem.

At the end of the day, it's about the money, said Randy Vataha, founder of Game Plan, a consulting and investment-banking service to the sports and entertainment industry. There is competition for people's time and attention, and it is hard for small market teams to get that, he said. Vataha also said that there should be a salary cap on all professional expenses, including coaches' and GMs' salaries.

Carlisle said that football has the best business model on things like salary cap, guaranteeing players contracts and bonuses, and being able to cut players when coaches see fit. Vataha agrees and said that "the NFL is by far the most successful league."

What initially seemed like an unlikely gathering at MIT turned out to make sense: it's all about the numbers.

Video

An Intelligent Electric Grid Peter L. Corsell, founder and CEO of GridPoint, talks about the problems inherent in today’s electric grid and describes how GridPoint’s technology improves it.
35 Innovators under 35 Tesla Roadster* Mitch Kapor Robotic Assistance Intensifying the Sun
35 Innovators under 35
Tesla Roadster*
Mitch Kapor
Robotic Assistance
Intensifying the Sun
 
 
35 Innovators under 35
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology